news
Ali Ansari , leading academic and Reader in Modern History at the University of St. Andrews, accepted the public apology of Zed Books Publishing over the claims of Mohammed Mohaddessin against him.
Ali Ansari* , leading academic and Reader in Modern History at the University of St. Andrews, accepted the public apology of Zed Books Publishing over the claims of Mohammed Mohaddessin against him. This apology’s over a claim that Ansari whole-heartedly endorsed atrocities committed under the Iranian regime. Ali Ansari has given expert evidence on Iran to the House of Commons select committee on foreign affairs. He brought High Court proceedings against Zed Books Ltd over comments made in the book Enemies of the Ayatollahs by Mohammed Mohaddessin, an opponent of the Iranian government (and a member of Mojahedin-e Khalq organization). His solicitor, Julia Schopflin, told Mr Justice Gray in London that the book characterised certain policies of the regime as "genocidal" and was highly critical of widespread executions, on occasions involving children as young as 13. In the book, Dr Ansari was described as an "ardent apologist" and a "fervent proponent" of a regime whose policies the author put on a par with the Nazis. Ms Schopflin said this would inevitably lead people to conclude that Dr Ansari whole-heartedly endorsed and supported the atrocities committed by the ruling theocracy, enthusiastically argued in defence of that regime and wilfully misrepresented the truth about it. "As an historian and commentator on Iran, the claimant's role is to observe developments dispassionately and assess them impartially. "In this context, to depict him as a propagandist for a regime responsible for the ruthless persecution that the author describes as having been carried out and as someone prepared to excuse the atrocities that the author says the regime committed clearly undermines everything that Dr Ansari stands for." She said that on receiving Dr Ansari's complaint, the publisher accepted fully that there was no basis for what had been written about him and immediately offered him an apology. It had been agreed that a suitable sum would be paid to an appropriate charity and Dr Ansari's legal costs met in full. The counsel for the publisher, Joanne Neenan, apologised for the damage and embarrassment caused by the allegations, which, she accepted, were completely untrue. Zed had agreed not to republish them and all relevant copies of the book had been recalled and the offending material destroyed. ______________________ * Dr. Ali Ansari is a Reader in Modern History at the University of St. Andrews. He specializes in the political history of the modern Middle East. Dr. Ansari has previously taught at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS) of the University of London, University of Durham and the University of Exeter.

New Articles

Iranian film sheds new light on security services

 The Iranian film "Midday Adventures," directed by Mohammad Hossein Mahdavian, begins in Tehran on June 19, 1981, 26 months after the Islamic Revolution and nine months after the outbreak of...

Iran Parliament firmly approves anti-US bill

Iranian lawmakers on Sunday overwhelmingly voted to approve a bill aimed at countering Washington's adventurous and terrorist activities in the region.

President Meta receives US Senate fact-finding delegation

President of the Republic Ilir Meta on Saturday received and held talks with a visiting US Senate delegation led by Senator Roy Blunt on a fact-finding trip to several Western...

We Hate Mojahedin-e Khalq: SNS Respond to a Conference of the Iranian Opposition

Dr. Raz Zimmt investigates Iranian social media responses to the annual conference of Mojahedin-e Khalq, an Iranian opposition group whose support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War remains a searing...

The Trump administration wants regime change in Iran. But regime change usually doesn’t work

President Trump is no fan of Iran. As a candidate, he had promised to tear up the Iran Nuclear Agreement. Having been frustrated in his attempts to do that —...

Most viewed

Jihad 2.0: the Making of the Next Nightmare

 “Albania is being turned into the center of MKO. John Bolton was recently in Tirana, with other international supporters of MKO, and they are attacking Iran and calling for regime...

Iran terror attack: Who gains?

No terror group could have executed on operation of this sort without the help of one or more state intelligence agencies.

ISIS Attacks in Tehran Expose US-Saudi Lies About Iran

Saudi Arabia’s finger prints are on every trouble sport in the Middle East. Not only did Saudi Arabia support NATO attacks on Libya, it also provided "Arab legitimacy" for it...

The Sordid History Of State Sponsored Terrorism Against Iran

For decades, Western empires have waged a silent war against Iran, using tactics ranging from supporting known terrorist groups to deposing the country’s leaders and leveraging regional rivalries. The war...

Iran and the Holy Warrior Trap

Is the West about to make the same mistake with Iran that it made with Afghanistan when it backed the Sunni mujahedin against the Soviet invaders? The Soviets ultimately were...