special

How Americans could trust on a terrorist organization, which officially threatens their backed government's interests in Iraq, opposes their solution, and hypocritically continues his anti-law behavior; and how they could remove this group from the FTO, while they are aware of its capacity to commit terrorist attacks, anywhere in the world?

It was three months ago when MEK (Mojahedin-e Khalq) presented a program to escape Iraq and to impose himself upon a European country under "European parliament Project". Despite the enormous cost of advertising, no country in Europe did notice it; also, the project has faced opposition from the U.S, and the United Nations has said nothing about it.
The interesting point about Mek proposed solution (so called European parliament Project) is that at the height of disregard and neglect of the West, Iraqi government is the only supporter of this solution, who, repeating the same content, in all related negotiations, calls for European countries to accommodate MeK.
American government, how ever, has raised a plan to displace MeK inside the Iraq, which is faced opposition from the Iraqi people, and has not been welcomed by that government.
Now, Mek in Iraq are facing the U.S, and their unwilling, even, against American proposition shows that Inconsistency with law lies in the nature of this terrorist group, and they are incompatible not only with the rules and the civil conditions in Iran and Iraq, but they controvert Environmental requirements of civil and civic behavior anywhere in the world.
Mojahideen have previously shown their anti-law natures, too; e.g. during attacks on Iranian embassies in some of western countries, and organized self- burning of some of them in 2003 in France. How ever, it seems that west wants to close his eye on some facts.
The interesting point is Synchronized Lobby efforts of MeK, to be removed from the FTO (Foreign Terrorist Organizations) of the U.S Department of State, with the crisis over Iraq, originated from the illegitimate presence of Mojahedeen; and obviously these are not unrelated.
Of the MEK, getting out from the FTO is the way to exit Iraqi crisis, too; why, for example, in such an assumption, they can oblige the U.S to take protection of the camp, which is not possible now now, because of being on the terrorist list.
On the other hand, recent statements of U.S. diplomatic officials about MeK condition in Iraq, indicates that whether they keep Mujahidin on the list, or not. How Americans could trust on a terrorist organization, which officially threatens their backed government's interests in Iraq, opposes their solution, and hypocritically continues his anti-law behavior; and how they could remove this group from the FTO, while they are aware of its capacity to commit terrorist attacks, anywhere in the world?

New Articles

Iranian film sheds new light on security services

 The Iranian film "Midday Adventures," directed by Mohammad Hossein Mahdavian, begins in Tehran on June 19, 1981, 26 months after the Islamic Revolution and nine months after the outbreak of...

Iran Parliament firmly approves anti-US bill

Iranian lawmakers on Sunday overwhelmingly voted to approve a bill aimed at countering Washington's adventurous and terrorist activities in the region.

President Meta receives US Senate fact-finding delegation

President of the Republic Ilir Meta on Saturday received and held talks with a visiting US Senate delegation led by Senator Roy Blunt on a fact-finding trip to several Western...

We Hate Mojahedin-e Khalq: SNS Respond to a Conference of the Iranian Opposition

Dr. Raz Zimmt investigates Iranian social media responses to the annual conference of Mojahedin-e Khalq, an Iranian opposition group whose support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War remains a searing...

The Trump administration wants regime change in Iran. But regime change usually doesn’t work

President Trump is no fan of Iran. As a candidate, he had promised to tear up the Iran Nuclear Agreement. Having been frustrated in his attempts to do that —...

Most viewed

Jihad 2.0: the Making of the Next Nightmare

 “Albania is being turned into the center of MKO. John Bolton was recently in Tirana, with other international supporters of MKO, and they are attacking Iran and calling for regime...

Iran terror attack: Who gains?

No terror group could have executed on operation of this sort without the help of one or more state intelligence agencies.

ISIS Attacks in Tehran Expose US-Saudi Lies About Iran

Saudi Arabia’s finger prints are on every trouble sport in the Middle East. Not only did Saudi Arabia support NATO attacks on Libya, it also provided "Arab legitimacy" for it...

The Sordid History Of State Sponsored Terrorism Against Iran

For decades, Western empires have waged a silent war against Iran, using tactics ranging from supporting known terrorist groups to deposing the country’s leaders and leveraging regional rivalries. The war...

Iran and the Holy Warrior Trap

Is the West about to make the same mistake with Iran that it made with Afghanistan when it backed the Sunni mujahedin against the Soviet invaders? The Soviets ultimately were...