special

Rajavi considered America's conflict with Iran the best opportunity to work; he has invested on this conflict for 9 years, but despite the gap in the relationship between these two countries the MeK has found no way to survive.

Iran Didban
Although MeK leadership currently is trying to bring on the frustrated troops that exiting Iraq is another ring of his chain of victories, certainly he can not negate that this is one of the most irreparable damages to the body of this organization after the Iraqi war against Iran ended and they reached to the deadlock.

The truth is that shortly after exiting Iraq, a legendary named "Liberation Army" will be forgotten, and, in competition with the opposition, Rajavi will possess nothing; because principally the most important function of those remained in Iraq was participating in the battle of the alternatives.

If Rajavi chances to deploy the uniformed troops to the Europe, At best he can force them to clap and dance in the group's campaigns. Even, according to the asylum law, he cannot dispatch them into streets to gather money.

So, exiting Iraq is something that should not be underestimated and it will involve MEK for a long time; also it will bring many negative consequences for them that would be clearer In future. Of the most important consequence is that the forces will be scattered in different countries and, under special rules for asylum, it would be difficult for the MeK leadership to exploit them.

MeK's present situations are similar to the condition of this terrorist group in 1982 while their organization was stamped out within the country.

Furthermore, in clamor over the group's exclusion from Iraq, failure of the MeK's leadership in trying to be removed from the FTO, and consequently staying in this country, has been neglected.

Rajavi considered America's conflict with Iran the best opportunity to work; he invested on this conflict for 9 years, but despite the gap in the relationship between these two countries the MeK found no way to survive. The reasons for this failure should be examined in an independent writing.

American government has kept the MeK on the terrorist list in order to open way for subsequent developments and changes that the group should accept. The changes' start point is the exit from Iraq and it arrive MeK to the condition yellow.

New Articles

Iranian film sheds new light on security services

 The Iranian film "Midday Adventures," directed by Mohammad Hossein Mahdavian, begins in Tehran on June 19, 1981, 26 months after the Islamic Revolution and nine months after the outbreak of...

Iran Parliament firmly approves anti-US bill

Iranian lawmakers on Sunday overwhelmingly voted to approve a bill aimed at countering Washington's adventurous and terrorist activities in the region.

President Meta receives US Senate fact-finding delegation

President of the Republic Ilir Meta on Saturday received and held talks with a visiting US Senate delegation led by Senator Roy Blunt on a fact-finding trip to several Western...

We Hate Mojahedin-e Khalq: SNS Respond to a Conference of the Iranian Opposition

Dr. Raz Zimmt investigates Iranian social media responses to the annual conference of Mojahedin-e Khalq, an Iranian opposition group whose support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War remains a searing...

The Trump administration wants regime change in Iran. But regime change usually doesn’t work

President Trump is no fan of Iran. As a candidate, he had promised to tear up the Iran Nuclear Agreement. Having been frustrated in his attempts to do that —...

Most viewed

Jihad 2.0: the Making of the Next Nightmare

 “Albania is being turned into the center of MKO. John Bolton was recently in Tirana, with other international supporters of MKO, and they are attacking Iran and calling for regime...

Iran terror attack: Who gains?

No terror group could have executed on operation of this sort without the help of one or more state intelligence agencies.

ISIS Attacks in Tehran Expose US-Saudi Lies About Iran

Saudi Arabia’s finger prints are on every trouble sport in the Middle East. Not only did Saudi Arabia support NATO attacks on Libya, it also provided "Arab legitimacy" for it...

The Sordid History Of State Sponsored Terrorism Against Iran

For decades, Western empires have waged a silent war against Iran, using tactics ranging from supporting known terrorist groups to deposing the country’s leaders and leveraging regional rivalries. The war...

Iran and the Holy Warrior Trap

Is the West about to make the same mistake with Iran that it made with Afghanistan when it backed the Sunni mujahedin against the Soviet invaders? The Soviets ultimately were...