One who takes Saddam as a model and swims in the blood river with his assistance should be entangled in the channels of fate and there’s no way to run away from the rule of Tawhid. There’s no doubt that pretending to be liberator movement and firing rockets at cities and killing the innocent makes channel. Becoming distant from people and resorting to the European parliament to find alliance is the same is becoming entangled in Charzebar channel which can be understood with little consideration
Masoud Rajavi, as the ideological leader of Mojahedin’s cult, in justifying the failure of Forough-e Javidan operation (Eternal Light Operation) and in resumption of ideological revolution issues made public his new discovery and put the blame on forces and accused them that being entangled in “Charzebar channel” was due to lack of evolution in the process of “Tawhid” and it had nothing to do with tactic and weakness in military planning!
Yes, being entangled in any channel necessarily comes from deviation in Tawhid and deviation starts with becoming anti-people, and being anti-people has roots in egocentricity and megalomania and these are exactly the same factors which have created so many channels for Mr. and Mrs. Rajavi.
Relation of “Channel” with “Tawhid”, is a logical relation and is based on divine order and promise. Passing each channel needs Tawhid; when Iran is supposed to be attacked with the support of a dictator like Saddam Hussein and Iranian people become the victims of The Rajavis’ ambitions, then God creates “channel” to entangle the enemies in it so that its name may be “Charzebar”.
Blind and frail is the one who interprets this channel to justify his own military mistakes and attributes the failure insolently to his forces and accuses them of being entangled behind the channels of their own egos! But all know that deploying the forces who had been trained for only two days and lining them in the road to be killed easily was aimed at getting their blood for opening next deadlocks and channels. But Saddam and Rajavi were beset by this blood, so that not to have a way out in the court of history.
In examining the channels which have entangled Mojahedin ever since- which have caused the blood of people and resistance to be shed- we find that the problem is in “Tawhid”, but not the one being considered by Masoud (toward which he stands as a saint and it seems that he and his wife have been born victorious and possess divine immunity! But we mean the real “Tawhid” whose orders are based on principles of logic, wisdom, justice and piety . The Tawhid which is people-centric and everyone is responsible toward this Justice house.
I mentioned this to facilitate review and examination of current channels which challenge the cult of Mojahedin.
One who takes Saddam as a model and swims in the blood river with his assistance should be entangled in the channels of fate and there’s no way to run away from the rule of Tawhid. There’s no doubt that pretending to be liberator movement and firing rockets at cities and killing the innocent makes channel. Becoming distant from people and resorting to the European parliament to find alliance is the same is becoming entangled in Charzebar channel which can be understood with little consideration. designating as terrorist and revealing sectarian thoughts of Mojahedin has not happened overnight and has nothing to do with politics; but it’s rooted in ideological deviations which have become evident and there have been made channels for them in the public opinion. Taking part in massacring Kurds and Shiites is certainly an anti-Tawhid act and therefore its consequence will be nothing except becoming entangled in another channel. Crucifying opponents and torturing people with any excuse, is considered as deviation from Tawhid and this deviation creates channel and this is what God has said…
Regarding the relation of “Channel and Tawhid” in all communities of Mojahedin cult, we can conclude that deadlocks before Mojahedin-e khalq are direct reflection of their functions and no one (neither regime nor any foreign element) has been involved in it. But understanding this important fact requires the understanding of “Tawhid” itself from which the Rajavis are too far.
In pursuit of regime change in Iran, the Trump administration and prominent Republicans and Democrats alike are supporting the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK), which former top US official Larry Wilkerson says...
Experts and political representatives from Albania were in the European Parliament last week, asking Europe for help in preventing the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) from toxifying their country’s internal and foreign...