view
But the amazing point is the opposition of an Iranian group to one of the articles of this constitution and it’s really surprising that they’ve become this much upset. The constitution explains clearly that enemies of Iraq, those who have damaged Iraq and Iraqis, can’t get asylum from Iraq. Now they want to seek asylum and take advantage of the rights of Iraqis, of the taxes they pay, and of their social security!! This is the right of Iraqis to reject it
From Ali Ghashghavi’s interview with Farhad Javaheri Yar As you know and it’s been reflected in the Arab and international media, Iraqi draft constitution was signed. There were several obstacles, bombings, killings and many threats. Even a Sunni group, which was the most powerful group when Saddam Hussein was in power, expressed its opposition to the constitution very openly, didn’t take part in the elections, didn’t introduce any candidates and every one was waiting to see what happens. Finally, a large number of Iraqi lawyers wrote this draft. This is, I think, a modern constitution, which will benefit today’s society of Iraq. It should be now put into referendum and all Iraqis should vote in order to say whether they want it or not. But the amazing point is the opposition of an Iranian group to one of the articles of this constitution and it’s really surprising that they’ve become this much upset. The constitution explains clearly that enemies of Iraq, those who have damaged Iraq and Iraqis, can’t get asylum from Iraq. Now they want to seek asylum and take advantage of the rights of Iraqis, of the taxes they pay, and of their social security!! This is the right of Iraqis to reject it. The law says clearly that “those who are accused of taking part in terrorist operations and those who have damaged Iraq.” The MKO and its international lawyers (that, I believe, have been deceived) always said that the MKO was independent in Iraq and that it was never mixed in the government. So, there’s nothing to worry about. The MKO says that it has never performed terrorist operations and that they have the right to seek political asylum in Iraq. Of course, I have something to say about the term “political asylum” that Mojahedin is seeking in Iraq. There’s no doubt that they are looking for a different kind of “political asylum”. They have protested to the article of constitution, saying that it has endangered their members!! A Persian proverb says: “take the rod, glutton cat escapes”. The MKO claims of democracy, human rights, free elections. It claims that it has never been involved in the crimes of Saddam Hussein in Kirkuk, Suleimanieh, Mandali, and Khaniqin. So, why is it frightened? Let it be passed. Does the MKO rejects this fact that new Iraqi government doesn’t want to serve, support and fund former enemies in its soil? I don’t know the logic MKO exactly. MKO has hired lawyers to protest to this constitution. They’re thousands of kilometers from the realities, and then they come and interpret an article of Iraqi constitution. Yes, they can play with this article. But MKO’s role in killing Iraqi people can’t be denied. MKO was strongly involved Iraqi security services. It controlled Iraqi prisons. It was involved in following and killing the opponents of Saddam Hussein. There are undeniable evidences for this; for instance, Rajavi’s confessions beside Taher Haboosh- he admitted to the crimes and missions he performed for Iraqi and said that the interests of Saddam’s government and the interests of Mojahedin are interwoven. They received money and patrolled in the streets, identified opponents and assassinated them. There are documents and tapes published. I now remember that one of the missions that Haboosh gave to Rajavi was to eradicate one of the bases of Iraqi oppositions. It was called Badr’s 9th base in Mosian region. Haboosh said why they had not killed Iraq’s oppositions inside Iran. This was in Iran. We have several cases inside Iraq. Those who were involved in suppressing Iraqi opposition groups at that time are now here. Many of those who took part in “Morvarid” operation, in suppressing people’s uprising in the north and south, have written their memories which can be cited. We welcome this article of Iraqi constitution. We hope that it opens a way for us to pursue those who tortured us in Iraq. We hope we can take our complaints to the court of Saddam Hussein and participate as private plaintiffs.

New Articles

Iranian film sheds new light on security services

 The Iranian film "Midday Adventures," directed by Mohammad Hossein Mahdavian, begins in Tehran on June 19, 1981, 26 months after the Islamic Revolution and nine months after the outbreak of...

Iran Parliament firmly approves anti-US bill

Iranian lawmakers on Sunday overwhelmingly voted to approve a bill aimed at countering Washington's adventurous and terrorist activities in the region.

President Meta receives US Senate fact-finding delegation

President of the Republic Ilir Meta on Saturday received and held talks with a visiting US Senate delegation led by Senator Roy Blunt on a fact-finding trip to several Western...

We Hate Mojahedin-e Khalq: SNS Respond to a Conference of the Iranian Opposition

Dr. Raz Zimmt investigates Iranian social media responses to the annual conference of Mojahedin-e Khalq, an Iranian opposition group whose support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War remains a searing...

The Trump administration wants regime change in Iran. But regime change usually doesn’t work

President Trump is no fan of Iran. As a candidate, he had promised to tear up the Iran Nuclear Agreement. Having been frustrated in his attempts to do that —...

Most viewed

Jihad 2.0: the Making of the Next Nightmare

 “Albania is being turned into the center of MKO. John Bolton was recently in Tirana, with other international supporters of MKO, and they are attacking Iran and calling for regime...

Iran terror attack: Who gains?

No terror group could have executed on operation of this sort without the help of one or more state intelligence agencies.

ISIS Attacks in Tehran Expose US-Saudi Lies About Iran

Saudi Arabia’s finger prints are on every trouble sport in the Middle East. Not only did Saudi Arabia support NATO attacks on Libya, it also provided "Arab legitimacy" for it...

The Sordid History Of State Sponsored Terrorism Against Iran

For decades, Western empires have waged a silent war against Iran, using tactics ranging from supporting known terrorist groups to deposing the country’s leaders and leveraging regional rivalries. The war...

Iran and the Holy Warrior Trap

Is the West about to make the same mistake with Iran that it made with Afghanistan when it backed the Sunni mujahedin against the Soviet invaders? The Soviets ultimately were...