view
after the MKO announced military phase in 1981, people had an active role in exposing MKO members’ safe houses. People came to the scene because the MKO opposed their goals and the MKO was forced to leave the country since it was not able to stay in the scene. After leaving the country, they resorted to superpowers in order to survive and did their best to their green light. For instance, in Saddam’s war against Iran they fought their compatriots alongside Iraqi soldiers
I’m Javad Hassanzadeh After Islamic revolution (in 1979) I was recruited by Monafeqin (MKO) and started political activities in students association. I went on with these activities until July 1981 when I was arrested and sentenced to 15 years in prison. In 1991, Iran’s supreme leader issued a public pardon and I was released from prison. I want to discuss a number of issues here. At first, since I was the brother of a martyr* I thought that I can find my goals and ideals in the MKO. With this background, and regarding that my elder brother was and is one of MKO activists, I joined the MKO and started activities. One of the most controversial issues about the MKO is its popularity and its social position and that whether people support its goals. Basically, the only movements that can have popular support are those which conform with people’s views and goals. Well, after the revolution, Iranians found their leader and followed him. But MKO’s stances against Imam [Khomeini]’s leadership became bolder and bolder. As they distanced themselves from leadership and his views, the gap between people and them became wider and wider. At first, when the opposition was not that serious, they could talk among people and even put their emblem beside the pictures of the leader, but in practice, they opposed the leader. They stood against the leader and in fact they stood against people and we saw that after the MKO announced military phase in 1981, people had an active role in exposing MKO members’ safe houses. People came to the scene because the MKO opposed their goals and the MKO was forced to leave the country since it was not able to stay in the scene. After leaving the country, they resorted to superpowers in order to survive and did their best to their green light. For instance, in Saddam’s war against Iran they fought their compatriots alongside Iraqi soldiers. This refers exactly to what I mentioned earlier: being far from people, leader and the Iranian society and when they felt being isolated, they did what they could to save themselves. What was not important for them anymore was their “goals”. What were the reasons for establishing this organization? What were the purposes? All these had been forgotten. They forgot what they used to say during 1979, 1980 and 1981. They did what they could to guarantee their survival and to prove themselves abroad. With their beautiful slogans, they were able to take some people out with themselves. Also, some others left the country later and joined them but they later they found that this is not the MKO of 1970s. This is not the organization they expected. At this point, they felt to have been entangled in a deadlock and decided to leave. When MKO leaders face such amount of defections they reacted harshly. MKO claims of freedom, democracy, liberty and human rights and says that members are free to go if they do not like it here. However, when someone understands that he has been deceived and decides to return (to have at least a normal life beside his compatriots), he would be insulted and tortured and unfortunately, it’s a shame for me to say that my brother (Hassan Hassanzadeh) is one of those torturers. I should say that I, as the brother of a martyr and as a person who’s been active in the process of revolution and has experienced prison, this is neither acceptable nor justifiable. Well, when someone doesn’t want to work, a “quitter” or whatever you call it, then it’s not justifiable to torture him or imprison him in Abu Ghraib. You always cried that there are prisons and tortures in Islamic Republic and maneuvered on such cases, but now you resort to prisons and torture to prevent members from leaving! This is not acceptable. I was in prison for a long time and I can say that, despite all the controversies they (MKO) made about prisons in Iran, there were not such things in the prison of Mashhad. ---------------------------------------------------- * Martyr Reza Hassanzadeh was killed by Shah agents during the Islamic Revolution.

New Articles

Iranian film sheds new light on security services

 The Iranian film "Midday Adventures," directed by Mohammad Hossein Mahdavian, begins in Tehran on June 19, 1981, 26 months after the Islamic Revolution and nine months after the outbreak of...

Iran Parliament firmly approves anti-US bill

Iranian lawmakers on Sunday overwhelmingly voted to approve a bill aimed at countering Washington's adventurous and terrorist activities in the region.

President Meta receives US Senate fact-finding delegation

President of the Republic Ilir Meta on Saturday received and held talks with a visiting US Senate delegation led by Senator Roy Blunt on a fact-finding trip to several Western...

We Hate Mojahedin-e Khalq: SNS Respond to a Conference of the Iranian Opposition

Dr. Raz Zimmt investigates Iranian social media responses to the annual conference of Mojahedin-e Khalq, an Iranian opposition group whose support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War remains a searing...

The Trump administration wants regime change in Iran. But regime change usually doesn’t work

President Trump is no fan of Iran. As a candidate, he had promised to tear up the Iran Nuclear Agreement. Having been frustrated in his attempts to do that —...

Most viewed

Jihad 2.0: the Making of the Next Nightmare

 “Albania is being turned into the center of MKO. John Bolton was recently in Tirana, with other international supporters of MKO, and they are attacking Iran and calling for regime...

Iran terror attack: Who gains?

No terror group could have executed on operation of this sort without the help of one or more state intelligence agencies.

ISIS Attacks in Tehran Expose US-Saudi Lies About Iran

Saudi Arabia’s finger prints are on every trouble sport in the Middle East. Not only did Saudi Arabia support NATO attacks on Libya, it also provided "Arab legitimacy" for it...

The Sordid History Of State Sponsored Terrorism Against Iran

For decades, Western empires have waged a silent war against Iran, using tactics ranging from supporting known terrorist groups to deposing the country’s leaders and leveraging regional rivalries. The war...

Iran and the Holy Warrior Trap

Is the West about to make the same mistake with Iran that it made with Afghanistan when it backed the Sunni mujahedin against the Soviet invaders? The Soviets ultimately were...