view
When a military force- with all that equipments and technology- reaches in its analysis to a point where it can’t ignore even grannies of Rajavi’s cult, and when its intelligence system needs to use the exposed members of Saddam’s private army (in order to gather intelligence through telephone calls) and when this force is entangled in a serious deadlock that it has to wear Saddam’s old dirty boots and defend what he used to take advantage of, what can be said? Does it come from its power or its tactical-strategic failure and confusion?
In recent days, more and more has been published about the efforts of Rajavi and his criminal gang to find a new master. In and interview with Massoud Khodabandeh, BBC Radio reported of the presence of Rajavi’s terrorist intelligence unit in Europe and America and revealed the plans of Rajavi’s cult (apparently on terror list, beside Osama Bin Laden and Taliban) to hunt down critics in European and Canadian cities. BBC also referred to the complaining letter of more than 80 critics (and former members) in Western democratic countries and asked if their governments (in the U.S., Canada and European countries) had done anything in this regard. http://www.irandidban.com/master-e.asp?ID=09516 In an interview with VOA, Iranian prominent journalist Mr. Safa Haeri disclosed that some parts in the US government- which have faced strategic deadlocks and want to use the remnants of Saddam’s toppled regime- are feeding the cult of Rajavi with intelligence. http://www.irane-ayandeh.com/soti/files/Shahid10Oct05.ram (interview in Farsi) Mrs. Singleton, in interview with BBC Radio Four, asked for more sensitivity by European countries’ authorities and said that there should be no double standards in treating this group. http://www.irandidban.com/master-e.asp?ID=09636 (interview transcript) Quoting an American official, German weekly “Focus” stressed that former mercenaries of Saddam Hussein are being used again in Iran-Iraq borders. http://www.irandidban.com/master-e.asp?ID=09634 Habilian website, which reflects news reports on MKO defectors who return to Iran, confirmed the above report by interviewing an informed source in the Iranian military. The amazing point is that it seems that Iranian military sources’ information on the cult and its use is more credible than that of intelligence sources of US security services. http://www.irandidban.com/master-e.asp?ID=09647 Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) published the same report as a proof for agreement between the Pentagon and its new mercenaries. IRNA said the items of this agreement are as follows: Identifying military targets for bombing Disrupting industries’ process, especially the industries related to Iranian nuclear program Sabotage Using Farsi language for gathering intelligence through phone calls, translation and … This was also reflected in Irandidban website. http://www.irandidban.com/master.asp?ID=09628 When a military force- with all that equipments and technology- reaches in its analysis to a point where it can’t ignore even grannies of Rajavi’s cult, and when its intelligence system needs to use the exposed members of Saddam’s private army (in order to gather intelligence through telephone calls) and when this force is entangled in a serious deadlock that it has to wear Saddam’s old dirty boots and defend what he used to take advantage of, what can be said? Does it come from its power or its tactical-strategic failure and confusion? If it’s the power of the US (not its failure and confusion) that has forced it to use remnants of Saddam terrorists in Iraq for its intelligence systems, what has really forced it to do so, considering all claims and fanfares? Regarding social, historical and political record of Iran, Iraq and the region, what should we expect? Should Iran be afraid of intelligence agents wearing dirty boots of Saddam Hussein or should it become clearer that these forces are empty-handed?

New Articles

Iran Parliament firmly approves anti-US bill

Iranian lawmakers on Sunday overwhelmingly voted to approve a bill aimed at countering Washington's adventurous and terrorist activities in the region.

President Meta receives US Senate fact-finding delegation

President of the Republic Ilir Meta on Saturday received and held talks with a visiting US Senate delegation led by Senator Roy Blunt on a fact-finding trip to several Western...

We Hate Mojahedin-e Khalq: SNS Respond to a Conference of the Iranian Opposition

Dr. Raz Zimmt investigates Iranian social media responses to the annual conference of Mojahedin-e Khalq, an Iranian opposition group whose support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War remains a searing...

The Trump administration wants regime change in Iran. But regime change usually doesn’t work

President Trump is no fan of Iran. As a candidate, he had promised to tear up the Iran Nuclear Agreement. Having been frustrated in his attempts to do that —...

Iran and the Holy Warrior Trap

Is the West about to make the same mistake with Iran that it made with Afghanistan when it backed the Sunni mujahedin against the Soviet invaders? The Soviets ultimately were...

Most viewed

Jihad 2.0: the Making of the Next Nightmare

 “Albania is being turned into the center of MKO. John Bolton was recently in Tirana, with other international supporters of MKO, and they are attacking Iran and calling for regime...

Iran terror attack: Who gains?

No terror group could have executed on operation of this sort without the help of one or more state intelligence agencies.

ISIS Attacks in Tehran Expose US-Saudi Lies About Iran

Saudi Arabia’s finger prints are on every trouble sport in the Middle East. Not only did Saudi Arabia support NATO attacks on Libya, it also provided "Arab legitimacy" for it...

The Sordid History Of State Sponsored Terrorism Against Iran

For decades, Western empires have waged a silent war against Iran, using tactics ranging from supporting known terrorist groups to deposing the country’s leaders and leveraging regional rivalries. The war...

Iran and the Holy Warrior Trap

Is the West about to make the same mistake with Iran that it made with Afghanistan when it backed the Sunni mujahedin against the Soviet invaders? The Soviets ultimately were...