view
What will Mojahedin do in the case of the U.S. attack to Iraq and overthrow of Saddam as their most important supporter?
What will Mojahedin do in the case of the U.S. attack to Iraq and overthrow of Saddam as their most important supporter? This is a question its answer is often presented by those related to the crisis or Iraq: Kurd opposition sources, during recent weeks, have reported the news about Mojahedin movements inside Iraq which shows their hatred and sensitivity toward this group and that they're waiting for a chance to divulge it on one hand, and the use of this group by Saddam prevents such a conflict. The groups and societies of those who have separated from Mojahedin, have presented almost clear outlook and analysis of Mojahedin situation and response in the case of war. For example "Mojahedin's future and Iraq crisis", an article published in Negahe-no website, is an answer to our initial question. Mojahedin also have reiterated that they have chosen Iraq to inflict on Iran, and they tried to hide their fear and anxiety with a powerful gesture. While the U.S. reviews Mojahedin in Iraq crisis as a terrorist group and a partner of Saddam in this case, Saddam also feels that supporting Mojahedin in front of Iraq Shiites will stable the arrangement of the forces loyal to him. From Iran point of view, this group has become a "Safety match" and it's only in European debates where they are pointed to. During recent years, their announcements and publications proves their fear of encountering Iranian forces. However, by different views and analysis, it seems that there's only one indispensable and fixed destiny for them. Whether they reach the borders of Iran and commit suicide en masse, or wait patiently for the events and changes of the future; whether Rajavi is able to flee to another country or another power wants to keep them alive and… they will move toward the historical annihilation and nonexistence. None of these options and possibilities will change the future of Mojahedin. Mojahedin's future is an "experience". An experience ahead of all social and political forces; and it indicates that basically one can't talk to people and society with turning the face from realities and with the language of force, aggression and terrorism. It's several years that Mojahedin have no place among the opposition abroad and play no role in the social and political scene of the country, there for the presence or absence makes no difference in the political situation of Iran. The promise of removing this terrorist group is the result of aggression and betraying the nation and the people. Like Saddam who's now entangled in disgrace and misery, after all that stubbornness and filling the region with fire and blood. Annihilation is a very little punishment for Mojahedin who have placed betraying the country in their agenda; they should be trialed in the court and should be interrogated for all their hidden and evident crimes, so that just like Bin Laden, they wouldn't be able to be proud and show off again.

New Articles

Iranian film sheds new light on security services

 The Iranian film "Midday Adventures," directed by Mohammad Hossein Mahdavian, begins in Tehran on June 19, 1981, 26 months after the Islamic Revolution and nine months after the outbreak of...

Iran Parliament firmly approves anti-US bill

Iranian lawmakers on Sunday overwhelmingly voted to approve a bill aimed at countering Washington's adventurous and terrorist activities in the region.

President Meta receives US Senate fact-finding delegation

President of the Republic Ilir Meta on Saturday received and held talks with a visiting US Senate delegation led by Senator Roy Blunt on a fact-finding trip to several Western...

We Hate Mojahedin-e Khalq: SNS Respond to a Conference of the Iranian Opposition

Dr. Raz Zimmt investigates Iranian social media responses to the annual conference of Mojahedin-e Khalq, an Iranian opposition group whose support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War remains a searing...

The Trump administration wants regime change in Iran. But regime change usually doesn’t work

President Trump is no fan of Iran. As a candidate, he had promised to tear up the Iran Nuclear Agreement. Having been frustrated in his attempts to do that —...

Most viewed

Jihad 2.0: the Making of the Next Nightmare

 “Albania is being turned into the center of MKO. John Bolton was recently in Tirana, with other international supporters of MKO, and they are attacking Iran and calling for regime...

Iran terror attack: Who gains?

No terror group could have executed on operation of this sort without the help of one or more state intelligence agencies.

ISIS Attacks in Tehran Expose US-Saudi Lies About Iran

Saudi Arabia’s finger prints are on every trouble sport in the Middle East. Not only did Saudi Arabia support NATO attacks on Libya, it also provided "Arab legitimacy" for it...

The Sordid History Of State Sponsored Terrorism Against Iran

For decades, Western empires have waged a silent war against Iran, using tactics ranging from supporting known terrorist groups to deposing the country’s leaders and leveraging regional rivalries. The war...

Iran and the Holy Warrior Trap

Is the West about to make the same mistake with Iran that it made with Afghanistan when it backed the Sunni mujahedin against the Soviet invaders? The Soviets ultimately were...