view
Different conventions which have been written after the second world war about the social and civil basic rights and have
Different conventions which have been written after the second world war about the social and civil basic rights and have been accepted by countries, have been completed by adding protocols to them, have been analyzed and clarified and also each convention and its additional protocol needs legal analysis so that its applicability in a special case is proved. These days Mojahedin are using Convention 1949 and Refugees Convention without having a clear and expert analysis. They are trying to create a paradigm so that to find a legal run-away method. Simultaneously with posing the case of their refugee case, they want to rely on some conventions in order to be treated as a non-military group. On the other hand, they insist that they're impartial, so that to prove they're captives and by this, they want to force occupying forces to accept the responsibility of protecting them. What we should know about UN Conventions is that in these conventions there're differences between "refugee" and "captive"; that is, no body can claim of being "captive" and "refugee" at a same time and these to cases are completely different. According to the Convention 195, refugee has no citizenship while war prisoner has the citizenship of his/her own country, wears the official clothes of his/her country with known signs and symbols of that country. Based on these differences, Geneva Convention 1951 (on Refugees) has items and acts which are different from those of Geneva Convention (on war prisoner) on 1949, August 12th. In reviewing conventions and legal matters, what is related to Mojahedin and helps them clarify their condition is avoiding from generality and playing with names and items in conventions and these legal matters should be reviewed carefully. What is more emphasized by the spokesmen of this group is the case of their asylum in Iraq. So, in order to clarify the asylum condition of Mojahedin according to definitions of laws, we bring some notes from conventions (related to the presence of Mojahedin in Iraq): In section C of article One in Geneva Convention 1951 about the following persons' asylum, convention is not executive: … 3. He has acquired a new nationality, and enjoys the protection of the country of his new nationality; or … 5. He can no longer, because the circumstances in connection with which he has been recognized as a refugee have ceased to exist, continue to refuse to avail himself of the protection of the country of his nationality; 6. Being a person who has no nationality he is, because of the circumstances in connection with which he has been recognized as a refugee have ceased to exist, able to return to the country of his former habitual residence; as seen in the above items and regarding the public pardon by the Iranian government even in the case of having the conditions of getting asylum, convention don't ban movement of the body of organization . but about those members who have committed a crime, convention has not stayed silent but it has clarified the case. In section F of Convention 1951 it says that the mentioned conditions are not applicable for those people who have done a crime: F. The provisions of this Convention shall not apply to any person with respect to whom there are serious reasons for considering that: (b) he has committed a serious non-political crime outside the country of refugeprior to his admission to that country as a refugee; (c) he has been guilty of acts contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations. And as it's been mentioned in parts A and F of article 1 of refugee convention, the one who has committed a crime against the peace of humanity or is a war criminal is not able to get refugee and terrorism is a part of crime against humanity and of the cases which violate human rights and is a part of JUS COGENS in International laws. So, terrorist groups do not meet the conditions of this convention and Mojahedin, for long, have been called "terrorists" in Europe and the U.S. In addition, according to the next part (B), those who have committed a crime and need public punishment can't apply for asylum. So, those MKO members who have committed a crime can't request asylum, but they're guilty and should be tried. And even the request of Iraqi Governing Council to try MKO members, who were involved in suppressing Kurds and Shiites, has been posed by referring to Part F from this very convention. Although according to the definition which was given at first, one can't introduce himself as a captive and refugee at a same time, but even if they introduce themselves as war prisoners they will be sent back to their countries after the end of enmities according to the Geneva convention on treating war prisoners(12 August, 1949). So, as it can be seen, even international laws don't let this group from justice

New Articles

US Is Helping ‘Bloodthirsty Cult’ – the MEK – to Overthrow Iran’s Government

In pursuit of regime change in Iran, the Trump administration and prominent Republicans and Democrats alike are supporting the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK), which former top US official Larry Wilkerson says...

Was it an Iranian terror plot or a false flag operation?

Belgian police say an Iranian diplomat was involved in a plot to bomb a rally of the dissident Iranian group MEK, but Iran says MEK itself is to blame.

Stephen Harper knocked for speaking at 'Free Iran' rally hosted by 'cult' ex-terror group

Harper's own government considered Mojahedin-e Khalq or MEK a terrorist organization as recently as 2012

Giuliani, Gingrich Visit MeK Conference to Push for Iran Regime Change

Trump aides see once-banned terror group as replacing Iranian government

The Despicable Hawkish Embrace of the MEK

The Trump administration’s MEK fans participated in the group’s annual rally in Paris over the weekend:

Most viewed

Basque militant group ETA: 'We really are sorry'

The Basque militant group ETA on Friday offered an unprecedented apology for the pain caused during its more than four decades of armed campaign for independence from Spain and France...

M.E.K.: The Group John Bolton Wants to Rule Iran

As talks with North Korea approach, the new national security adviser, John Bolton, has long pushed for regime change in another country with nuclear ambitions: Iran. One of his chosen...

Rudy Went to Albania to Hang Out with A Iran Regime Change Cult

Mujahideen-e Khalq (MEK) is a notorious cult-like group of Iranian exiles which appears to have close to literally zero support inside Iran but has for years cultivated significant ties to...

April 1992 marks the MKO’s determination to conduct terror acts abroad

Experts and political representatives from Albania were in the European Parliament last week, asking Europe for help in preventing the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) from toxifying their country’s internal and foreign...

Footprints of MKO terrorists, monarchists seen in recent unrests in SW Iran

The protests in the city of Kazeroun in Southwestern Iran ended and the situation came under control after Mojahedin-e Khalq Organization (MKO, also known as the MEK, PMOI and NCRI)...