view
When Saddam Hussein defended MKO and built military bases for them in Iraq, he wanted to use MKO as a winner card
When Saddam Hussein defended MKO and built military bases for them in Iraq, he wanted to use MKO as a winner card against the presence of thousands of Iraqi Shiites who lived in Iraq and the para-military Badr Brigade. Despite his efforts, this group couldn't push Iran, as Iraqi Shiites and Badr effected Iraq, and the role of this group summarized in giving secret information to Iraq's intelligence service. The clear contradiction here is that these two sides, Iraq and Iran, were considered by the US as "axis of evil" and the strategic centers of these two countries were targets of the US. As it became clear during US invasion against Iraq, these centers, which were strategic and military bases in the countries, were targeted by the U.S. and this was a victory for Iran since widened the role of it in the region. That is, war between Iraq and the US ended eventually with Iran getting benefits. After the occupation of Iraq, Mojahedin-e Khalq will be under the control of American officials and not the Iraqi authorities, since there's no firm decision-making body in Iraq and Iraqi Governing council is considered as a mediator between US forces and Iraqi groups. One of the cases the IGC has discussed is the case of Mojahedin-e Khalq. MKO is a bargaining chip for the US and also a tool of pressing Iran. Despite the order of IGC to expel MKO from Iraq until the end of 2003, there has been no practical action against them since the American side wants a good reaction. Of course, we should consider this that changing the statement of IGC and keeping MKO forces in Iraq to use them against Iran as a press tool seems unlikely. In Iraq also, there's not a single united stance toward MKO and the variety of stances refer to the stance of occupiers. Of course, despite the differences on other issues among IGC members, they all agree on the case of MKO, and beside the Shiite leaders and those who are happy with the fall of Saddam, they want immediate expulsion of MKO. Between these two views is the stance of the United States. This county has put MKO's card in its pocket and treats this group according to its occupying benefits in Iraq and its interests toward Iran. The interests of Iraqi people, who demonstrate in Iraq against this group, are not valuable in comparison with those of Americans but the unity of IGC with the US takes place easily. Dr. Rashid wrote this article for Jordan-based daily "Al-Arab Al-Yum" and you can read Arabic article at: http://194.165.135.200/article/rasheed/previous/p5.htm

New Articles

NATO’s Terrorist Bases in Europe

NATO and the United States, which, together, claim to be fighting some sort of amorphous “global war on terrorism,” have enabled a terrorist group to establish bases in two NATO...

John Bolton – defender of Zion, promoter of MEK terrorism – fees revealed

John Bolton’s appointment as Assistant to the President, National Security Advisor attracted controversy because of his past links to the terrorist MEK group. Now his Public Financial Disclosure Report reveals...

US Forces Albania to Take IS Fighters After Hosting MEK

“Albania will become a coordination center for fighters returning from ISIS to the Balkans,” announced Bulgaria’s Prime Minister Boyko Borissov during a joint press conference with Albanian Prime Minister Edi...

Trump’s Betraying His Base With The MEK

Trump’s base would be shocked to discover that influential members of his administration are vocal supporters of a cultish Islamo-communist terrorist group.

Back to the future? Bolton, Trump and Iranian regime change

Bolton is reportedly pushing a plan for regime change in Tehran similar to the one rejected years ago during the Bush era

Most viewed

124 Iranian members of MEK escaped and asked for asylum from Albanian police

124 Iranian residents who came to our country as members of the MEK organization have rejected the organization and its ideology, but risk suffering the same fate as in Iraq...

Why Bolton’s MEK Connection Matters

Jason Rezaian comments on Bolton’s enthusiasm for the Mujahideen-e Khalq (MEK) and what it means for U.S. Iran policy:

US attempts at regime change in Iran are doomed to failure

There are no viable alternatives that Trump could bring to power in Iran to replace the current regime.

MEPs discuss Mojahedine-E Khalq (MEK) Threat in Albania

Experts and political representatives from Albania were in the European Parliament on Tuesday 10th April, asking Europe for help in preventing the Mojahedin-e Khalq (MEK) from toxifying their country’s internal...

Basque militant group ETA: 'We really are sorry'

The Basque militant group ETA on Friday offered an unprecedented apology for the pain caused during its more than four decades of armed campaign for independence from Spain and France...