view
what's amazing about them is that they have a lot in common, although their differences are notable
Bin Laden: Born in Saudi Arabia, he studied in the US and became a fan of the US. He reached power in Afghanistan. He was backed by the US. He became assuming (and in a pre-planned scenario) attacked the US. The US called him a terrorist. Bin Laden disappeared. Saddam: Born in Iraq, got to power in Iraq. Became US's ally. Attacked Iran. Became closer to the US. He became assuming (and in a pre-planned scenario) attacked Kuwait. The US called him a terrorist. He was captured. Rajavi: born in Iran, he called the US "imperialism". Revolution took place. He was deprived from power, so he became angry. He made friendship with Saddam. In Iraq, Celebrated Bin Laden's operations. Bush toppled Saddam. Rajavi moved toward Bush. The US didn't like him. He persisted. The US didn't accept. Committed suicide. Pentagon accepted. Rajavi disappeared. Similarity: in the view of these 3 ones, both the US and imperialism are lovely/ all three are reactionary cultists/ none of them has popular support/all of them are laughing at the people! Differences: two Arabs, one Persian/ two with moustache, one with moustache and beard/ two disappeared, one in prison/one wanted by the US, one in US prison, one looking for the US! Historical conclusion: the only lesson from history is that no one gets lessons Political conclusion: power is blight, whether you have it or you are looking for it! Moral conclusion: in the doctrine of opportunist power-seekers, moral has not been defined! Terrorist conclusion: terrorism is good, depending on who the terrorist is?!

New Articles

Iran Parliament firmly approves anti-US bill

Iranian lawmakers on Sunday overwhelmingly voted to approve a bill aimed at countering Washington's adventurous and terrorist activities in the region.

President Meta receives US Senate fact-finding delegation

President of the Republic Ilir Meta on Saturday received and held talks with a visiting US Senate delegation led by Senator Roy Blunt on a fact-finding trip to several Western...

We Hate Mojahedin-e Khalq: SNS Respond to a Conference of the Iranian Opposition

Dr. Raz Zimmt investigates Iranian social media responses to the annual conference of Mojahedin-e Khalq, an Iranian opposition group whose support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War remains a searing...

The Trump administration wants regime change in Iran. But regime change usually doesn’t work

President Trump is no fan of Iran. As a candidate, he had promised to tear up the Iran Nuclear Agreement. Having been frustrated in his attempts to do that —...

Iran and the Holy Warrior Trap

Is the West about to make the same mistake with Iran that it made with Afghanistan when it backed the Sunni mujahedin against the Soviet invaders? The Soviets ultimately were...

Most viewed

Albania’s Anti-Trafficking Coordinator Elona Gjebrea Praises Maryam Rajavi For Keeping Modern Slaves In Tirana

As democratic elections go, Albania’s upcoming parliamentary elections are as bad as it gets. Protests and turmoil have characterised the leadup to the June election. The official opposition is continuing...

Jihad 2.0: the Making of the Next Nightmare

 “Albania is being turned into the center of MKO. John Bolton was recently in Tirana, with other international supporters of MKO, and they are attacking Iran and calling for regime...

Iran terror attack: Who gains?

No terror group could have executed on operation of this sort without the help of one or more state intelligence agencies.

ISIS Attacks in Tehran Expose US-Saudi Lies About Iran

Saudi Arabia’s finger prints are on every trouble sport in the Middle East. Not only did Saudi Arabia support NATO attacks on Libya, it also provided "Arab legitimacy" for it...

The Sordid History Of State Sponsored Terrorism Against Iran

For decades, Western empires have waged a silent war against Iran, using tactics ranging from supporting known terrorist groups to deposing the country’s leaders and leveraging regional rivalries. The war...