view
It should also be noted that other branches of Tahkim-e Vahdat have not been ignorant about the MKO. As the nature of MKO indicates, they consider it a mercenary force and an enemy of Iranian people. This leaves no place for honorable students to cooperate with the group. Of course, as we saw, the students deprived foreigners from the chance of interfering in Iran's internal affairs.
16 of Azar (December 7) passed and like all previous years, active political student groups commemorated it. As expected, according to the political situation in the Universities, some these groups criticized the policies of government on issues related to higher education. Amazingly, the terrorist group of the MKO took this issue as an opportunity to boost the morale of its desperate members; therefore, they tried to introduce the students' activities as a proof for their wrong analyses, according to which they describe the situation of the society as "exploding" and claim that armed forces in Iran are relentlessly struggling to suppress popular protests. Of course, in this article, there's no need to say that how baseless these analyses are (and have been during past 25 years). However, what is important in respect to the topic of our article is that those who gathered in Technical College in Tehran on 16 of Azar are all known people and those who follow the political news and issues of Universities are familiar with them and their positions. That they are known is very important and raises questions that the MKO should answer. The question is that why the MKO advertises on this gathering and tries to take advantage of it? To answer this question, it should be clarified that protestors were from Tahkim-e Vahdat Association, which generally includes National-Religious elements with different attitudes the most radical of whom are people like Mr. Tabarzadi. Everyone is aware of Mr. Tabarzadi's letter and his views on the MKO. He and his sympathizers- as the radical ones- believe that: (1) the organization of Mojahedin-e Khalq is a terrorist organization; it should review its past and throw away its leaders if it wants to have a role in Iran's political scene, (2) this group should compensate its treacherous cooperation with Saddam Hussein against Iranians. It should also be noted that other branches of Tahkim-e Vahdat have not been ignorant about the MKO. As the nature of MKO indicates, they consider it a mercenary force and an enemy of Iranian people. This leaves no place for honorable students to cooperate with the group. Of course, as we saw, the students deprived foreigners from the chance of interfering in Iran's internal affairs. Now, regarding the nature of movements inside Iran and their hatred for the gang of Rajavi, it should be said that MKO's advertising on recent developments in Iran is as if they are advertising for Monarchists in the US or Workers' Communist Party in Sweden or England! Of course, it should be said that there's no similarity between honorable Iranian students and other dependent groups abroad, but the comparison was made only with respect to the fact that the MKO is against these groups and censors news related to them. Why the MKO resorts to hypocrisy in this regard is clear: 1. Inherent opportunism of the group and its abuse of the situation in order to help the desperate conditions even if the group should stand against its own violent strategies. 2. Lagging behind the international developments and its inability to influence the situation as well as its efforts to save its face. 3. Finally, this approach has only internal uses for the MKO. It should be noted that the MKO has repeatedly announced that movements inside Iran are bound to the government and that none of them want the overthrow of regime. MKO has announced that these groups don't meet the goals of Mojahedin and that these groups sometimes have consensus against the MKO. However, since the group should prove the "exploding situation of society", they should take advantage of such news events reflected in domestic and international news agencies. In the end, it should be stressed that the hypocrisy of the MKO will only damage MKO's own claims and violent anti-human stances, since in Iran, no group or movement accepts the cult of Rajavi and its positions. Therefore, all MKO's propaganda can be considered as obituary for Rajavi's thoughts.

New Articles

The MKO, the essence of North Korea

The tensions between North Korea and the United States have escalated in the past days. The United States is preparing for all options, including a “preemptive war,” to stop North...

Does Albania have an America problem?

A willing rendition partner, a 'dumping ground' for Guantanamo Bay detainees, and now sending troops to fight IS in Iraq... What won't Albania do for the US?

Iranian film sheds new light on security services

 The Iranian film "Midday Adventures," directed by Mohammad Hossein Mahdavian, begins in Tehran on June 19, 1981, 26 months after the Islamic Revolution and nine months after the outbreak of...

Iran Parliament firmly approves anti-US bill

Iranian lawmakers on Sunday overwhelmingly voted to approve a bill aimed at countering Washington's adventurous and terrorist activities in the region.

President Meta receives US Senate fact-finding delegation

President of the Republic Ilir Meta on Saturday received and held talks with a visiting US Senate delegation led by Senator Roy Blunt on a fact-finding trip to several Western...

Most viewed

Jihad 2.0: the Making of the Next Nightmare

 “Albania is being turned into the center of MKO. John Bolton was recently in Tirana, with other international supporters of MKO, and they are attacking Iran and calling for regime...

ISIS Attacks in Tehran Expose US-Saudi Lies About Iran

Saudi Arabia’s finger prints are on every trouble sport in the Middle East. Not only did Saudi Arabia support NATO attacks on Libya, it also provided "Arab legitimacy" for it...

Iran terror attack: Who gains?

No terror group could have executed on operation of this sort without the help of one or more state intelligence agencies.

The Sordid History Of State Sponsored Terrorism Against Iran

For decades, Western empires have waged a silent war against Iran, using tactics ranging from supporting known terrorist groups to deposing the country’s leaders and leveraging regional rivalries. The war...

Iran and the Holy Warrior Trap

Is the West about to make the same mistake with Iran that it made with Afghanistan when it backed the Sunni mujahedin against the Soviet invaders? The Soviets ultimately were...