view
The Mujahedin is an organization that was supported, sheltered and funded by Saddam Hussein until he lost power. In the 1980s, MKO sided with Saddam in his war against Iran. Its leadership fled to Iraq in the middle of the 1980-1988 Iraq-Iran War and received millions of dollars in financial support from Saddam Hussein. As a result, MKO members are viewed as traitors by the overwhelming majority of Iranians and Iranian-Americans
On Jan. 20, the Los Angeles Times reported that "Iranian Americans generally ... oppose a nine-year State Department crackdown on an organization (MKO) that it classifies as terrorist but that the Iranian community considers a resistance group." As an Iranian-American, I am dismayed that some member of Congress as well as journalists claim that the terrorist-listed organization Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK/MKO) and its front organizations are legitimate representatives of the Iranian American community. They are not. The Mujahedin is an organization that was supported, sheltered and funded by Saddam Hussein until he lost power. In the 1980s, MKO sided with Saddam in his war against Iran. Its leadership fled to Iraq in the middle of the 1980-1988 Iraq-Iran War and received millions of dollars in financial support from Saddam Hussein. As a result, MKO members are viewed as traitors by the overwhelming majority of Iranians and Iranian-Americans. The organization actively engaged in acts of violence, including murder bombing and armed attacks against Iranians and American citizens working in Iran prior to the Iranian Revolution. Their totalitarian-inspired ideology since the 1960s has centered on anti-Americanism spiced up with bits of Marxism-Leninism on the one hand and Islamic extremism on the other. When the Mujahedin and their comrades succeeded in the revolution, a new wave of violence ensued and the Mujahedin emerged as the losers in the infighting. It was the organization's addiction to violence without remorse that resulted in its unequivocal classification as a terrorist organization by the State Department, the Department of Justice, the White House and the European Union. Yet the MKO has been active in lobbying the United States Congress as the self-appointed representative of Iranians. Please note that my opinion of the MKO should not be seen as support for the regime in Tehran. I, as most Iranian-Americans, find an anti-democratic government and an anti-democratic opposition equally distasteful. Iranians deserve representatives more authentic than the self-appointed claimants, whether in clerical robes or guerrilla fatigues. Fariborz Mokhtari Waitsfield

New Articles

Iranian film sheds new light on security services

 The Iranian film "Midday Adventures," directed by Mohammad Hossein Mahdavian, begins in Tehran on June 19, 1981, 26 months after the Islamic Revolution and nine months after the outbreak of...

Iran Parliament firmly approves anti-US bill

Iranian lawmakers on Sunday overwhelmingly voted to approve a bill aimed at countering Washington's adventurous and terrorist activities in the region.

President Meta receives US Senate fact-finding delegation

President of the Republic Ilir Meta on Saturday received and held talks with a visiting US Senate delegation led by Senator Roy Blunt on a fact-finding trip to several Western...

We Hate Mojahedin-e Khalq: SNS Respond to a Conference of the Iranian Opposition

Dr. Raz Zimmt investigates Iranian social media responses to the annual conference of Mojahedin-e Khalq, an Iranian opposition group whose support for Iraq during the Iran-Iraq War remains a searing...

The Trump administration wants regime change in Iran. But regime change usually doesn’t work

President Trump is no fan of Iran. As a candidate, he had promised to tear up the Iran Nuclear Agreement. Having been frustrated in his attempts to do that —...

Most viewed

Jihad 2.0: the Making of the Next Nightmare

 “Albania is being turned into the center of MKO. John Bolton was recently in Tirana, with other international supporters of MKO, and they are attacking Iran and calling for regime...

Iran terror attack: Who gains?

No terror group could have executed on operation of this sort without the help of one or more state intelligence agencies.

ISIS Attacks in Tehran Expose US-Saudi Lies About Iran

Saudi Arabia’s finger prints are on every trouble sport in the Middle East. Not only did Saudi Arabia support NATO attacks on Libya, it also provided "Arab legitimacy" for it...

The Sordid History Of State Sponsored Terrorism Against Iran

For decades, Western empires have waged a silent war against Iran, using tactics ranging from supporting known terrorist groups to deposing the country’s leaders and leveraging regional rivalries. The war...

Iran and the Holy Warrior Trap

Is the West about to make the same mistake with Iran that it made with Afghanistan when it backed the Sunni mujahedin against the Soviet invaders? The Soviets ultimately were...