view
The question is that why the MEK consider it a strategy to get the support of Americans, despite always being rejected by the US? MEK is not able to move without this support and illustrate lack of support as a choking situation for the group! The more important question is that why the US doesn't support this group officially in spite of enmity with Iran?
"The US considers MEK a terrorist organization. This organization has committed horrible crimes, including the assassination of a number of US citizens. We have nothing to do with the MEK," said US Secretary of State Condy Rice before starting her travel to the Middle East; she is from a party that represents the most extremist views on Iran since 27 years ago. Earlier this month also, Rice thumbed down the requests of Raymond Tanter- MEK's relentless supporter and active lobbyist for this group in the US- to remove the group from terror list. She insisted that the MEK is a terrorist organization. We can remember how she had replied to the people who dreamed of using the MEK after the ouster of Saddam Hussein: "Using terrorists, NO, NO, NO". In addition, MEK's repeated appeals in different US courts during past 10 years have always been futile due to undeniable evidences on group's terrorist activities. MEK's non-stop lobby activities have always failed… The question is that why the MEK consider it a strategy to get the support of Americans, despite always being rejected by the US? MEK is not able to move without this support and illustrate lack of support as a choking situation for the group! The more important question is that why the US doesn't support this group officially in spite of enmity with Iran? The answer to both questions lies in this fact that "the MEK has no popular support in Iran but it's hated by majority of Iranians. This group has no power to influence Iran's political issues". Although the group chants converse questions in this regard, group's urgent need to get out of terrorist list (and all-out efforts by the group to achieve this goal) proves this fact. On the other hand, the US is fully aware of this fact otherwise it would employ this group if it knew the group was useful for its purposes. Now that the US is against this group, and unlike Europeans is not influenced by the accusation of being dealing with Iran, the group and its supporters won't be able to do anything even if they're removed from terrorist lists; any one who supports this group knows that he should protect them (like what Saddam did) so that they (MKO) can advance its ideological revolution.

New Articles

The MKO, the essence of North Korea

The tensions between North Korea and the United States have escalated in the past days. The United States is preparing for all options, including a “preemptive war,” to stop North...

Does Albania have an America problem?

A willing rendition partner, a 'dumping ground' for Guantanamo Bay detainees, and now sending troops to fight IS in Iraq... What won't Albania do for the US?

Iranian film sheds new light on security services

 The Iranian film "Midday Adventures," directed by Mohammad Hossein Mahdavian, begins in Tehran on June 19, 1981, 26 months after the Islamic Revolution and nine months after the outbreak of...

Iran Parliament firmly approves anti-US bill

Iranian lawmakers on Sunday overwhelmingly voted to approve a bill aimed at countering Washington's adventurous and terrorist activities in the region.

President Meta receives US Senate fact-finding delegation

President of the Republic Ilir Meta on Saturday received and held talks with a visiting US Senate delegation led by Senator Roy Blunt on a fact-finding trip to several Western...

Most viewed

Jihad 2.0: the Making of the Next Nightmare

 “Albania is being turned into the center of MKO. John Bolton was recently in Tirana, with other international supporters of MKO, and they are attacking Iran and calling for regime...

ISIS Attacks in Tehran Expose US-Saudi Lies About Iran

Saudi Arabia’s finger prints are on every trouble sport in the Middle East. Not only did Saudi Arabia support NATO attacks on Libya, it also provided "Arab legitimacy" for it...

Iran terror attack: Who gains?

No terror group could have executed on operation of this sort without the help of one or more state intelligence agencies.

The Sordid History Of State Sponsored Terrorism Against Iran

For decades, Western empires have waged a silent war against Iran, using tactics ranging from supporting known terrorist groups to deposing the country’s leaders and leveraging regional rivalries. The war...

Iran and the Holy Warrior Trap

Is the West about to make the same mistake with Iran that it made with Afghanistan when it backed the Sunni mujahedin against the Soviet invaders? The Soviets ultimately were...